Generally, linguists are required in law enforcement and. In addition to the required contact hours (lectures and tutorials), it is expected that students will spend an additional 6-7 hours per week on this course. The job will generally have them working as translators, interpreting, and doing forensic sciences. This course has 3 contact hours per week (lectures and tutorials) that may be held in a 3 hour block. For additional information regarding Turnitin please visit the ANU Online website. While the use of Turnitin is not mandatory, the ANU highly recommends Turnitin is used by both teaching staff and students. The ANU uses Turnitin to enhance student citation and referencing techniques, and to assess assignment submissions as a component of the University's approach to managing Academic Integrity. Word essay or analytical project) worth 40% Increased by 500 words for each additional student in the group). Home activities based on the principle textbook, worth 10% eachĪnd 1000 word write-up worth 20% (can be a group project with the length of write-up

Explain, and argue for the role of language and linguistics in the legal system.

Understand the potentials and limits of forensic voice identification.

Robert Leonard, Director of the Institute.

Select and apply appropriate methods for identifying authorship of texts The Institute for Forensic Linguistics, Threat Assessment, and Strategic Analysis is the umbrella entity serving as the research, internship, and special projects arm of the Program in Linguistics: Forensic Linguistics at Hofstra University.

Understand the different types of linguistic data that can be used as evidence.

Understand the role of expert evidence relating to language in court, and review and assess the strength of evidence presented by expert witnesses.

Upon successful completion, students will have the knowledge and skills to:īy the end of this course, you should be able to: The course has no prerequisites the necessary basic linguistic and statistical ideas and tools will be introduced and explained. There are many branches of forensic linguistics 1, but the basic premise is that the evidence of linguists can be used in both civil and criminal court cases.For example, an expert on spoken language may be asked to identify a voice on a recording, or perhaps decide if a suspect was really able to comprehend what was asked of him or her during an interrogation. We also learn about the use of computational and statistical tools in linguistic analyses. In this course we go through the various sub-fields and issues of forensic linguistics for example, voice comparison, speaker profiling, authorship analysis, disputed utterance, plagiarism, transcription, translation-interpreting, interrogation and verballing, while explaining the nature of linguistic evidence and the role that linguistics and languages play in the legal proceedings. Forensic linguistics is a diverse field that not only has applications in legal and criminal investigations, but also makes important contributions to the military, government and business, and can contribute to literary, historical and cultural studies.

Despite such reservations, courts generally recognize that there is a place for linguistic expertise in appropriate cases.This course focuses on the role that linguistics and languages play within the rapidly growing field of forensic science namely forensic linguistics. Reasons for judicial reluctance to admit linguistic expertise include concerns that it is not sufficiently reliable, the belief that issues like the meaning of a text can just as well be decided by a jury, and sometimes even institutional and political considerations. In other areas the admissibility of linguistic testimony has been more controversial, including author and speaker identification, discourse analysis, the meaning of legal texts, and the comprehensibility of jury instructions. Based on published judicial opinions, from which we draw our data, it appears that courts have allowed linguists to testify on such issues as the probable origin of a speaker, the comprehensibility of a text, whether a particular defendant understood the Miranda warning, and the phonetic similarity of two competing trademarks. Often linguistic expertise is clearly helpful to the judge or jury.

It is becoming increasingly common for linguists to testify as expert witnesses in both civil and criminal trials.